Press releases

The ruling against the President of the Tunisian Judges Association is a violation of Tunisia’s judicial Independence

The Arab Center for the Independence of the Judiciary and the Legal Profession (ACIJLP) expresses its strongest condemnation of the ruling issued against the notable judge Anas Al-Hammadi, President of the Tunisian Judges Association, by the Court of First Instance in Tunis on 6 April, sentencing him to one year’s imprisonment in connection with his exercise of his right, as a judge, to engage in public matters and to defend the independence of the judiciary in Tunisia. The ACIJLP considers that Judge Al-Hammadi exercised his legitimate right, in his capacity as a judge and President of the Tunisian Judges Association, to defend judicial independence and to protect its members against interference by the executive authority in the work of the Tunisian judiciary, in accordance with the United Nations Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary, adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in December 1985. Articles 7 and 8 of these Principles affirm that members of the judiciary, like other citizens, are entitled to freedom of expression, belief, association, and assembly, and that judges have the right to form associations or other organizations to represent their interests, promote their professional training, and safeguard their independence.

 To read the full statement, please open the link :

Approval of law permitting execution of Palestinian prisoners violates international humanitarian law,requires consent of Palestinian National Authority

The Arab Center for the Independence of the Judiciary and the Legal Profession (ACIJLP) strongly condemns the issuance by the Israeli parliament of a law permitting the application of the death penalty to Palestinian prisoners under the authority of the occupation, notwithstanding the abolition of the death penalty for murder in Israel since 1954. This constitutes a clear violation of the provisions of the Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, which prohibits the conviction of any prisoner of war for an act that is not expressly prohibited by the law of the detaining power. Moreover, prisoners of war in situations of occupation are entitled to the protections afforded by international humanitarian law governing the treatment of detainees in times of war.

The ACIJLP further notes that the occupying authority does not possess the right to impose the death penalty for any offense without the consent of the state to which the prisoners belong. Article 100 of the Third Geneva Convention stipulates that “Prisoners of war and the Protecting Powers shall be informed as soon as possible of the offences which are punishable by the death sentence under the laws of the Detaining Power. Other offences shall not thereafter be made punishable by the death penalty without the concurrence of the Power upon which the prisoners of war depend” — namely, the Palestinian National Authority.

 To read the full statement, please open the link :

Cairo, 31 March 2026

ACIJLP calls on Arab Gulf states to expedite accession to the International Criminal Court

The Arab Center for the Independence of the Judiciary and the Legal Profession (ACIJLP), together with the Arab Coalition for the International Criminal Court, is monitoring the US-Israel-Iran war and the accompanying military operations that have affected most of the Arab Gulf states (Qatar, Kuwait, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Oman, and the United Arab Emirates). These military operations have resulted in acts that may rise to the level of the crime of aggression, war crimes, and crimes against humanity, in accordance with Articles 5, 7, 8, and 8 bis (A) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. The ACIJLP considers that ratification by the Arab Gulf states of the Rome Statute establishing the International Criminal Court would grant them the right to request investigations and prosecutions in relation to the military operations to which they are subjected. This right is accorded to States Parties to the Court where the alleged crimes have occurred after 2002, in line with the Court’s temporal jurisdiction.

 To read the full statement, please open the link :

Cairo, 26 March 2026

Human rights organizations call for lifting 10-year travel ban on Hoda Abdel Wahab

Egypt: Lift Travel Ban imposed on Hoda Abdelwahab ten years ago

The undersigned organisations call on the Egyptian authorities to immediately lift the travel ban imposed ten years ago on Egyptian lawyer Hoda Abdelwahab, in connection with Case 173/2011 and to ensure that all human rights defenders and civil society actors can exercise their right to freedom of movement without arbitrary restrictions or prolonged administrative uncertainty.

Hoda Abdelwahab is an Egyptian lawyer and the Executive Director of the Arab Centre for Independence of Judiciary and the Legal Profession (ACIJLP), a regional organisation established in 1997 that works to promote judicial independence, the rule of law, and respect for human rights across Egypt and the Arab region.

ACIJLP was among the NGOs investigated in Case 173/2011, known as the “foreign funding” case targeting NGOs in Egypt in late 2011. In December 2011, police and public prosecution officials searched the organisation’s offices and seized computers and documents from the premises.

On 20 June 2016, as she was departing to Oslo to participate in an international conference on the death penalty, Abdelwahab was informed at Cairo International Airport that a travel ban had been imposed on her by judicial order. She was never formally notified of this order and believes it is linked to Case 173/2011, which was reopened in 2016.

In March 2024, after 13 years of investigations – and three days following the declaration of the EU–Egypt strategic partnership agreement- the Egyptian authorities officially announced the closure of Case 173/2011. The investigating judge confirmed the completion of all investigations assigned to him concerning the remaining Egyptian civil society organizations in the case.

However, Abdelwahab remains the only human rights defender still subject to the travel ban imposed in 2016 in connection with Case 173/2011, after the authorities lifted the travel ban on her colleague Nasser Amin in December 2024. The travel ban on Hoda Abdelwahab has now been in effect for more than 10 years.

She continues to face restrictions without formal notification or clear legal reasoning, despite repeated attempts to clarify her status, including submitting pleas and complaints to the criminal court and the Public Prosecution office. The authorities have provided only unclear responses to her requests and have not officially removed her from the case file, which remains pending before the Supreme State Security Prosecution.

Travel bans continue to be used in Egypt as a tool to restrict the movement of human rights defenders, NGO workers, lawyers, and former detainees, often without due process or formal notification.

The undersigned organisations call on the Egyptian authorities to immediately:

Lift the arbitrary travel ban imposed on Hoda Abdelwahab as well as similar restrictions targeting human rights defenders and civil society actors;

Provide clear legal clarification regarding Abdelwahab’s status in Case 173/2011, particularly in light of the official closure of the case;

Acknowledge that ACIJLP was neither referred to trial nor formally investigated, and that the closure of Case 173/2011 confirms that there are no grounds for criminal proceedings;

Provide reparations for the prolonged restrictions Hoda Abdelwahab has faced due to the arbitrary travel ban and related measures;

Guarantee the protection of civil society and human rights defenders so they can operate without fear of intimidation, judicial harassment, or restrictions.

Signatories:

EuroMed Rights

Egyptian Front for Human Rights

Egyptian Commission for Rights and Freedoms.

Egyptian Human Rights Forum (EHRF)

Law and Democracy Support Foundation (LDSF)

Refugees Platform in Egypt (RPE)

Sinai Foundation for Human Rights

Committee for Justice

Egypt Wide for Human Rights

El Nadeem Center

Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies (CIHRS)

The Arab Center For The Independence of the Judiciary and the Legal Profession (ACIJLP)

Interference in the affairs of justice is a crime not subject to statute of limitations

The Justice Support Foundation at the Arab Center for the Independence of the Judiciary and the Legal Profession expresses its profound concern and deep disquiet regarding circulating reports of directives issued by the executive authority seeking to abolish the Judges’ Appointments Office at the Office of the General Prosecutor, assign the Military Academy responsibility for the training and appointment of new assistant prosecutors, and assume authority over judicial promotion files. This concern is further exacerbated by the fact that, as of the issuance of this statement, no official body has come forward to deny these reports.

The Foundation affirms that judges, as those entrusted with making final determinations affecting citizens’ lives, freedoms, rights, obligations, and property, in accordance with the United Nations Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary, are not defending a private or corporatist interest. Rather, judicial independence is a matter that directly concerns the fundamental rights and freedoms of citizens and the protection of both private and public property.

 To read the full statement, please open the link :

Cairo, 22 January 2026

On the sidelines of the Assembly of States Parties to the International Criminal Court The ACIJLP discusses “The current position of Arab states regarding the International Criminal Court”

The Arab Center for the Independence of the Judiciary and the Legal Profession (ACIJLP), in cooperation with the Arab Coalition for the International Criminal Court, held a seminar on the margins of the Assembly of States Parties convened in The Hague from December 1–6, 2025, entitled “The current position of Arab states regarding the International Criminal Court.” The seminar was attended by numerous representatives of International Criminal Court (ICC) member states, international and regional organizations, and members of the Secretariat of the Coalition for the International Criminal Court.

Nasser Amin, Director of the ACIJLP, reviewed the evolution of Arab states’ positions from the 1998 Rome Conference to the present day. He noted that the Arab stance has undergone significant shifts over almost 27 years, ranging from outright rejection and caution toward the very concept of the ICC to a limited rate of ratification of the Rome Statute, with only 13 Arab states having done so. This was followed by a further development marked by the ratification of the Statute by five Arab states (Jordan, Djibouti, Comoros, Tunisia, and Palestine), and subsequently by growing support from several countries in the region for the Court’s work and commendation of its recent decisions. However, no substantial progress has been made toward additional accessions to the Court.

 To read the full statement, please open the link :

To read the news on the Facebook page, please open the link:

Cairo, December 4, 2025

Arab Center for Independence of the Judiciary Law Firm